"The insistence of gospel-rooted social action is a dream of a genuinely covenantal community of neighbors. That finally is what the "kingdom of God" means. But covenantal neighborliness is a demanding alternative in the world, one deeply at odds with our conventional ways of thought and life. I submit that our work is to bring every aspect of our life together under the neighborliness of God.
In doing so, I dare suggest, there are only two difficult questions. One is sex. Sexuality has to do with intimacy and power; the Bible, so it seems to me, intends covenanted sex and not promiscuity or exploitation. The other hard question is money, for money is about freedom and control, and the Bible is for covenantal economics that are not promiscuous or exploitative. It strikes me as odd- but predictable- that conservatives, people who tend to stress evangelism, care a lot about covenantal sexuality but seem strangely naive about promiscuous, self indulgent economics. Conversely, liberals, those who seem to care about social action, have some sure sense of covenantal economics but tend to mumble about sexuality. Why not a recognition that money and sexuality are twin manifastations of our lust for power, our refusal of commitment, our will to live otherwise, but also our chance for genuine neighborliness as intended by God? I cannot think of a reason to choose up sides on these issues, for such choosing is silly and obsolete."
Walter Brueggeman ' Together in the Spirit- Beyond Seductive Quarrels' in "Deep Memory, Exuberant Hope: Contested truth in a post-Christian world" pp39
Launch day is here!
1 day ago
4 comments:
nice quote
Conservatives sure have problems with money and power, but it seems to me that the liberals are the ones for more government control, via welfare. For liberals, the state is god.
"Are you a liberal or a conservative?"
"What a silly and obsolete question!"
Nice.
Mike Bull - I think B's point is that both sides are exercising their lust for power in their political agenda. The attempt of political conservatives to control what they perceive as the "moral" issues (i.e. sex) is just as much a grab for power as political liberals to control economics.
Gold quote!
It's interesting to see the symmetry in failure that he points to.
Is there also an assymetry in 'being-for' vs 'being-against' those outside? Perhaps both in unhelpful ways?
Post a Comment